| Wow,
what a year. I got married and, after almost 2 months, neither Karen nor
I have voted each other off the island. That’s a pretty good start and
there are many good reasons to be optimistic for 2004. Pictures from the
wedding to follow in another month or two.
We rounded off the year with a lovely
weekend at the St. Regis Club at the Essex House, one of New York City’s
finest hotels, with a suite overlooking Central Park, an endless parade
of horses and buggies out your window and a floor butler. We tried being
tourists and seeing the City again for the first time: breakfast in the
hotel (excellent), room service, Radio City Christmas Spectacular with
the Rockettes, noshing in Greenwich Village, the museum of art and design,
and walking along Fifth Avenue. Very nice way to spend a weekend without
flying somewhere and there are good weekend rates available during the
winter.
Now, let’s talk about the rest of
the world. Go back and reread my end of year notes from 2003; they were
mostly on the mark and anyone who followed its advice profited.
India/Pakistan – Rising fortunes
here in India as country reforms from its over-regulatory past; prime minister
and his party should do well in the March elections. Pakistan is a very
scary place; Musharraf is very vulnerable and the security cordon around
him has been shattered from the inside. Makes one wonder about the country’s
nuclear situation. The army’s #2 is a good guy and the army supposedly
has a good lock and key on the nuclear technological components, but the
Islamists have a strong hand in the country’s intelligence services. Israel
and India are cooperating highly these days on the anti-terrorism front;
there is worry about Saudi and Pakistani cooperation toward an Islamic
bomb. Several years ago the CIA warned that the India/Pakistan situation
was the most likely cause of nuclear war; I think the situation between
the two countries has simmered down a bit, but nuclear leakage coming from
Pakistan is the most probable of threats facing third parties in the world.
Korea – The parties will continue
negotiating. China has inserted itself into the situation and this matters
a bit, but ultimately the matter will play itself on a low flame with the
Chinese keeping the North Koreans somewhat honest until the Good Leader
either cries Uncle or is eliminated, either of which could be years away.
Technology – Plasma TV is an interim
technology; LCD is going to be the future or more space-efficient regular
televisions. Spam filters and new laws are having an effect on dampening
this industry and reducing a major annoyance to people.
Currency and Equity Markets – Euro
to continue rising to 1.35-1.40 against the Dollar. This is not so bad
for Europe; they buy many raw materials from the USA used for their manufacturing.
Stocks will continue to appreciate but there is an underlying weakness
in this market; people are not really buying things freely and “stability”
is only a heartbeat away from a terrorist attack (and it is clear that
the terrorists are out there trying the best they can and will sooner or
later succeed). Go for index funds rather than try to pick out individual
stocks. Look at ishares.com for easy-in easy-out indexes around the world.
Some foreign markets are likely to outperform the US this year; look at
China and perhaps Latin America (where Argentina and Brazil are improving;
in Brazil’s case it is because a leftist came to power and adopted conservative
economic principles). Arab economies are also improving, although their
markets are not very liquid. The Saudis balanced their budget this year
for the 2nd time in 20 years. The Iraq war has been a bonanza to the neighborhood
(and they all thought a year ago it would be a downer).
Cyprus – Pretty much resolved this
year, as I predicted. The Turkish side, prodded by its public, will figure
out how to get their house in order in time to join the EEC with the rest
of Cyprus by 1 May or soon after.
US Presidential Race – Bush is unbeatable.
I haven’t spent 10 minutes trying to learn details about Dean, Kerry and
whoever else is running. There will be a lot of print given to Democratic
hopefuls as the party’s strategy of putting an early-leader in place backfires,
and they will spend months destroying each other. Meanwhile, Bush will
sit pretty and above all this. I still like Lieberman as Best of Bunch
of Democrats, but the guy looks like he is caught in a perpetual sigh and
he fails the “Do I want to see this guy on TV every night for the next
4 years” test (which is a must-pass in order to become President). In Canada,
Australia, and elsewhere, more conservative governments are taking power.
Blair is safe this year in the UK as is Putin in Russia. Mexico’s Fox is
not safe this year, having not done very much and having not figured out
how to get Bush to work with him.
The War Against Terror and the various
Players involved – Iran is still running its nuclear program, but I look
at it as inevitable anyway. Iraq is a work in process; the US has aligned
with Iran to provide a measure of stability for Iraq and has figured out
that a Shiite-led Iraq is not a big problem for America (more a problem
for Iran really over the long term and of course it will keep the other
Sunnis in the region reliant on the US because they are scared to death
of these Shiites). Libya’s nuclear concession is more a psychological shift
than anything because the country didn’t have much going for it in this
area, but there is a sense around the world that nuclear disarmament is
back on the agenda and that Bush has rogue countries on the defensive.
The Israelis will never give up this deterrent (and I don’t think its neighbors
would benefit if it did because it helps keep the neighborhood honest).
An important shift this year is that Europe now views Saudi Arabia as being
on the dark side of the war against terror. The French, UK and Germans
had bad experiences this year finding out things about Saudi diplomats
and getting little or no cooperation from the country’s officials. Syria
must feel pressured, and I wouldn’t be surprised if Sharon and Assad began
talking to each other this year (the fact that Sharon just announced a
new Golan settlement program is probably a good cover for this).
The Arab World is watching the Iraq
experiment with interest and hoping it succeeds with dividends for them.
There is no question that the deck of cards has been reshuffled this year.
There are temptations for the US to cut loose from Iraq in an election
year, but I think that Bush is strong, the long-term interests are vital,
and there is no reason to believe that the US will do less than whatever
is necessary, particularly since it has so far found that it has been working
the learning curve rather well and that cutting corners results in losses.
The replacement troops coming in the spring also have learned lessons from
mistakes of their predecessors and will likely have better relations on
the ground with the natives (the amount of attacks on the various types
of US troops correlates to the behavior of those troops). The country is
set to receive as much aid as it can possibly absorb, the oil industry
and various reconstruction projects are moving on or ahead of target (and
it will become more noticeable in 2004 as infrastructure projects kick
in; there might even be a need to import workers if all the Iraqis are
employed on these projects), and there is no evidence so far that Haliburton
is profiteering; it is a war zone with unpredictable demand and insecurity
and the normal rules of business do not apply.
Bin Laden remains to be caught; probably
sometime before the next election. I’ve always felt that catching him too
early works against the war on terror because it makes for a false sense
that it has been won. True, much of the Islamic world still sees America
as the root of all evil, and they have good reason to be hostile. Not all
the danger is coming from the outside; one area overlooked is the amount
of fundamentalism in the US federal prison system; moderate moslem imams
complain they cannot get literature into the prisons because the chaplains
are all extremists and a good amount of terrorist training and indoctrination
goes on inside. But I think that America is in the midst of a Great Experiment
in Arabia that threatens the current order and that promises Arabs a better
future for the next generation to come. The war is not against Islam; it
is against Islamic fundamentalists and the key is to remember that we have
allies who would be good allies if we managed not to confuse them for enemies.
For the short run while America runs on panic-attack and figures out how
to calibrate risk, many people will school in other countries, there will
be seen fundamentalists behind every conflict brewing in the world, and
trade with America will be reduced, but in the long run (say another 5-10
years), the world could be a better place for one-eighth the world’s population
and they could have more trade, education and wealth properly distributed.
It could also be a safer world from the likes of Korea and Pakistan. It
will be a painful wait and we will take hits in the meantime, but I think
we should all stay the course, mainly because there is no better alternative.
France – This country faces the prospect
of severe civil unrest in the not so distant future. Chirac this year chose
sides; he is not sucking up to the Moslems but is rather taking them on
because he has figured out they will never support him. The French have
very rigid ideas about what it means to be French, and nobody at the top
is pushing integration where it is needed. They cannot ignore the Arab
immigrant population that is poor, alienated, multiplying and increasingly
religious as a backlash to the “secular” French which is really biased
toward Catholicism and against anything else. The rest of Europe is rightfully
nervous.
Israel/Palestine – Sharon corruption
scandal gains traction now that video exists of his son discussing these
real estate deals. But the press doesn’t want to bring him down just yet;
he keeps dangling the prospect of peace and there is nobody else on the
horizon that could deliver it. So he keeps tempting; a step forward, a
step backward; talking peace but building a wall and more settlements to
create facts on the ground. The settler population seems to have doubled
over the past decade. The Palestinians are wasting time; Arafat refuses
to die or to yield; he is still pathetically in his hut and over the past
year has reasserted control over the purse. Barghouti is still in jail;
Sharon has neutralized his opponents; the Labor party doesn’t even have
a leader whose name anyone knows (unless you believe that Peres can again
somehow be anything). The Likud alternatives are Olmert and Bibi, the first
of whom is palatable but not powerful; the second of whom is powerful but
not palatable. The economy, tied more to NASDAQ than to peace, is rebounding
even though it is still a tough life there. Tourism is back up; flights
and hotels are expensive again and there is a tremendous amount of fundraising
and programming going on in the Jewish World for the benefit of Israel,
despite any qualms about Sharon and his government. The Egyptians and Jordanians
have let the Palestinians know that time is not on their side and that
they are not going to get anywhere waiting for the world to get the Israelis
to move first. It is a sign of the times that the average Israeli today
couldn’t care less who is the current prime minister of the Palestinians
and have no interest in talking to him, and that they also show no interest
in the various ceasefires being bandied about among the Egyptians and Palestinians.
The Israeli government managed to sideline the Geneva initiative; I personally
didn’t find it to be so problematic, but the Israelis went out and convinced
enough of the mainstream that it was an awful idea and an unacceptable
end-run around their sovereignty to be strong-armed into such a scheme.
There is a good lesson to be learned here, and that is that private initiatives
to get governments to get other governments to change policy are not likely
to work because governments work with each other directly and have their
own agendas of give and take; there is lots of horse-trading that goes
on which is the basis for international relations, and the people sitting
in Geneva don’t have what to trade in order to get their way. Arafat has
to either die or be killed sooner or later and the Palestinians will get
something in the process (although less as time goes by – though the 1948
population also ages and dies in the meantime). The Israelis and various
Jewish organizations are preparing in a serious way to lodge claims for
the loss of $5 billion worth of Jewish property and the displacement of
850,000 Jews who lived in Arab countries who also wound up on the short
side of life after 1948. They will seek to prove through unearthed documentation
that the Arab League made a pact to force Jews out of these countries after
Israel was created; whatever the cause and effect, the Jewish population
of those countries now totals about 8,000, meaning 99% wound up leaving.
Short term though, 2004 probably ends with Sharon and Arafat still sitting
exactly where they are now. Last year I said that if something didn’t happen
this year, it probably wouldn’t for several more.
A month ago I wrote that Israel is
in a coma. I take that back. Actually, there has been significant change
over the past year, albeit a quiet earthquake. The shakeup has been in
the Likud. The mainstream of the party has figured out that Israel can’t
remain an occupier and continue as a democracy if it winds up ruling an
apartheid state with a Palestinian minority which could become a majority.
It doesn’t want to be in this position because it knows that it is wrong.
But it has also come to believe that no negotiated settlement is possible
either with Arafat or with Palestinians of this generation because the
hatred has become so deep that it will take a new generation of people
to reconcile themselves to living side by side with a Jewish state. And
so they are building this wall to implement a unilateral solution if the
Palestinians don’t come to the table and make a deal soon. This represents
a big change in the status quo; the concept of holding onto all the territories
is no longer the objective of the mainstream of the Likud party, and the
concept of transferring the Palestinians to Jordan is also out the window
as unrealistic and wrong.
Egypt – I’m less sure that Gamal
Mubarak is going to take over that country when his dad dies, but I have
no idea who will.
China – The Big New Power in Asia,
especially now that America is lowering its profile in countries such as
Indonesia and Malaysia, due to fears about terrorism coming from those
countries. The region is tailoring its policies toward doing business with
China, and the Chinese are making reforms in order to do more business
with the rest of the world. They will likely make better quality goods
as they strive to become more like Korea in its second stage of development
after the Korean War.
Google: I went to a lecture today
about geneological research and its connection to art provenance investigation.
It is amazing how much of an indispensable resource the Internet and its
search engines such as Google have become and you wonder how people tracked
things down without it. Last year Google even catalogued Global Thoughts.
Can you imagine? |