Future Global Thoughts Columnist
Our City Gal at Zabar's lunch counter taken from the street
HI-HO, HI-HO, It's Off To Work We Go!
Our little Elizabeth is such a city
gal. At the supermarket, she passes up the offer of chocolate chip cookies
by the man behind the bakery counter and says “I want biscotti” instead.
She wants to go “to the courtyard” to play and likes to sign for packages
at the building’s concierge counter. She is also an amateur lock picker;
she has figured out how to use a housekey to let herself into the bathroom
when I am in it. She noticed one day when I showed Karen how to rescue
Jeremy who had locked himself inside. Jeremy is almost walking and is amazing
on the jungle gyms at the parks; he climbs up almost any slide.
We are heading on our first major
holiday out of the eastern time zone; 2½ weeks in California including
LA, San Diego, Yosemite National Park and Napa Valley. We are to return
just before the Jewish New Year and next month you’ll get some nice photos
and notes, I hope.
Some comments on recent world events:
US Elections – I am going
to have a hard time with this election. On one level it is very simple
for me. The only real connection I have to the US government is paying
taxes and Obama will raise them significantly so therefore I want to vote
for McCain. On the other hand, the Republicans have so mismanaged this
country that the business climate is so poor on every count that it is
a hidden form of taxation and there is no good place to invest money in
this country. H1B immigration is still under quota killing small businesses
and driving the next generation of innovators and future world leaders
away from the country; the deficit is at an all-time high and the US is
basically broke so banks are paying no interest on deposits and are not
lending money even to good creditors and people are so nervous that they
now hesitate to keep more than $100,000 in a bank account, the stock market
is down with no end in sight; the US dollar is so devalued on the world
stage that even people in flea markets in India and Africa don’t want to
accept it anymore; the price of oil is at an all-time high and nothing
is really being done to reduce dependence on Arab oil with the Republicans
having so many business interests there, and real estate markets are depressed
to the greatest degree since World War II, and the country’s leading companies
and assets are all being sold to foreigners out of distress, all of which
point to an irreversible decline that will take at least a generation to
reverse. The Democrats have done a much better job of managing these things
over the past 2 decades. Reagan’s economic policy was poor and Clinton
was the only one who balanced the budget. The Republicans talk about marriage
and taxes but they never did anything about the marriage penalty and they
have never done anything for 2 decades except create deficits and allow
the government to go into disrepair always spouting forth nonsense about
the free markets but allowing oligarchies to abuse real people such as
what has been done in the airline industry and putting in ideologues into
governmental service agencies that don’t know how or don’t care to provide
essential services such as air traffic control. Their tax cuts have been
so meager that American Express gives more cash back to its credit card
holders. Basically they talk the talk but they don’t walk the walk and
I’m sick of it and on this count it is obvious that America is also sick
of it and totally ready to vote for Democrats. Who cares about foreign
policy when your domestic economy is going down the drain? We don’t have
a billion dollars to give the Republic of Georgia when we don’t have a
billion dollars to fix our own state of Georgia.
Obama has not convinced me that he
has any real plans for “change.” He’s never done anything but run for office
and make inspirational speeches, according to Democratic activists I’ve
talked to who can’t bring themselves to vote for him. He has run a disciplined
campaign and can be expected to run a disciplined administration. Biden
is certainly qualified to be VP or President. McCain’s pick for VP is a
joke; the lady just got herself a passport this year and is probably the
most underqualified person since Quayle to be picked for the job and it
speaks volumes for McCain’s potential judgment as a president besides the
fact that his campaign has been a hodgepodge of disorganization. (Something
about Palin strikes me as odd – she is so big on having kids even when
she knows they have Down Syndrome, but when she had her last kid, she went
back to work after 5 days.) McCain has few friends and would probably
be an ineffective president; he won’t get along with Congress and they
will basically legislate around him and he will be out after one term.
Obama is likely to have a strong team who will probably work well with
a Democratic Congress to cut meaningful deals on legislation driven mainly
by staff and this is not necessarily a problem; the presidency is a bully
pulpit and his job is mainly to sell a policy and get others to go along
with it.
But you cannot escape certain points
that McCain makes – McCain has a lifetime of supporting change and reform
and Obama has no track record of taking on his party or any real institution.
I buy the argument that McCain couldn’t pick Lieberman because he needs
to first look within his political party and I also think that Lieberman
would be a poor running mate to complement McCain’s weaknesses. McCain
is also unquestionably a man of character and Obama has nothing on him
there. People believe what McCain says and nobody is sure if Obama believes
what he himself says or feels that they know what he really stands for.
People have to BELIEVE in their president and McCain is in a strong advantage
point for this gut check in the polling booth even if they are not quite
sure what kinds of things he might do as president. I think this race will
be decided closely and at the very end by people’s gut feelings in the
last 2 weeks and that the debates will matter and that ultimately the vice
presidential candidates will not matter because they seldom do, except
that if more trash comes out about the Palin, it will hurt McCain. She
does have popular appeal with an approval rating higher than McCain, Obama
or Biden; the Democrats will try to simply ignore her and hope that people
talk less about her than McCain.
In my opinion, Obama is likely to
lead a presidency that will probably pass more legislation that will be
good for the country but he will raise taxes in the process, but you have
to wonder by how much? Taxes are already high and we are at the point where
the more they tax, the more people will avoid them which will effectively
lower the rate of tax revenue, particularly if the economy continues to
underperform. Whatever his foreign policy preferences, Biden will have
influence and anyway we all pretty much have seen that Bush’s foreign policy
has been a failure even with the Russians who feel totally free to ignore
us because Bush is all bark with no bite, so how much worse can he do?
Even the North Korea “success” seems to be a mirage with the country quietly
putting their reactors back together. McCain is a better choice if you
actually want very little to be done and for the president and congress
to basically bicker with each other.
The US is so messed up right now
that more of the same is simply unsustainable. Problem is that McCain won’t
deliver the change we need and Obama will, even though he has no idea what
it is and will probably have little to do with figuring it out.
I think that I will wind up voting
for McCain, Obama might well win and then we will sit around in 4 years
and find that it wasn’t so bad after all. But the real question to answer
is what will the white christian man do in the voting booth on election
day, and if you can answer that, you will know who will win.
Russia – My friend in Moscow
is riding high. He thinks Putin is running a great country, that it is
as democratic as it needs to be, and that if he once was thinking of taking
residency in another country, he is no longer thinking about it. He likes
the fact that Russia bullies Europe and Central Asia around and that it
knocks off foreign joint venture partners and leaves them shirtless. I
think this is short-term gain for Moscow which is flush with oil money
and that over the long haul the Russians will be big losers. Foreign investors
are getting out or reassessing their prospects, the rouble had to be devalued,
the stock market is falling and Europe which had its head in the sand is
on full notice that it faces a bully. Poland went straight into the embrace
of NATO after sitting on the fence and playing hard to get for close to
2 years, Georgia will be sacrificed but nobody cares for it anyway, and
Ukraine will probably be sacrificed as well. The Russians have to be granted
a sphere of influence just as America has, but let’s face it, Georgia was
an easy prize to conquer and it was somewhat stupid for the Russkies to
stomp around and take what was so easy to get just so that they could show
everyone their muscle. The Europeans are dependent on them for energy and
the Turks have to reassess their energy policies with the ‘Stans which
hoped to bypass Russia, but over the long haul, this will energize all
the nations around Russia to redouble their efforts to learn to live without
them (ie: to look for other fuel sources). People see what the Russian
policy is and they won’t trust them and won’t want to do business with
them. The Russians got their deterrence but in the process they scared
everyone away and will be left alone economically which will drain them
once oil prices decline in the next 5 years, especially if they intend
to fund troops all over their spheres of influence to make such influence
felt. It is a game that they ultimately can’t win because Russia can’t
really grow its economy without foreign investment since its domestic production
is still quite weak amid a controlled economy.
World Economy – a few items
of interest. Auto sales in China are declining markedly. Could be because
of the lowered subsidies or a slowed economy it could be a blip because
people were watching the olympics. But there is certainly a trend and American
auto manufacturers are nervous because they were hoping China would help
rescue them from subpar sales in the US. The evidence is that the rest
of the world is also seeing an economic downturn; Australia suffers from
the fall of commodity prices and the UK is really in bad shape with a poor
housing and banking market. One interesting counter to all this is that
US states are giving away all kinds of incentives to get foreign companies
to locate factories here and they are succeeding because US workers are
highly productive and the weak US dollar favors foreign investment – a
German auto executive said this week on the front page of the Financial
Times that the US is right now one of the cheapest places in the world
to locate a factory. Problem overall which ties into what I wrote above
is that we will one day wake up to find out that our factories are owned
by foreign companies and that we are producing some other nation’s profit.
Basically, the present US economy poses opportunities for the US in the
world amid the fact that others are doing worse than we are; but these
are opportunities borne out of weakness, not out of strength, and in order
to turn things around, there need to be major structural changes.
Israel and the Arabs – In
another week or so we will find out who will be the next prime minister
and I don’t think Olmert will hang around in his chair for long. Presumably
Tzippi Livni will win the Kadima primary and Ehud Barak will have to explain
how someone who he said a month ago was not qualified to be prime minister
is going to have him play second fiddle to her. If Livni turns out to be
stronger than everyone says she is, she will be prime minister for awhile
since nobody wants elections except for the Likud and Bibi Netanyahu. Otherwise,
there will be elections within a year and he will become the next prime
minister because Ehud Barak is unelectable and unpopular within his own
party and nobody sees anyone else right now as ready and able to do the
job. Right now nobody is running against Barak mainly because they are
hoping he does so poorly so that they can blame him for their defeat.
It is a bit of a farce right now
with Olmert and Rice trying to make deals with the Palestinians and Syrians
before the clock runs out on Olmert. The Palestinians and Syrians are sensibly
not agreeing to anything because they don’t want to be embarrassed agreeing
to terms with a lame duck. Livni, I must recall, was said to have met with
the Palestinian negotiator over 70 times by November 2007 when I was told
about it, and never once in any of those meetings pulled out maps. So you
can imagine how fruitless it must have been to be talking with her and
what you could expect if she became prime minister. Considering the stated
views of Livni, Mofaz, Barak and Netanyahu, I think it is almost impossible
to believe that there will be any kind of viable agreement with the Palestinians
in the near term. There is the basis for an understanding with Syria; the
Golan is not the issue; Lebanon is and these are not a problem for the
Israelis, particularly if the Democrats take over the White House and no
longer stand in the way of an agreement because of their gut distaste for
Syria. I also read the Financial Times feature this month about Assad and
his wife based on a biographer who knows them and went over their life
histories. It was an eye opener; I had previously thought him an idiot
and been led to think this by others. This article makes them both out
to be much more cosmopolitan than I thought and says that both of them
want to fundamentally change Syria and bring it into the world but not
to do it too quickly. Besides, Assad has no choice as he found out when
he tried to cozy up to the Russians this month by offering them military
facilities in Syria after their Georgia invasion and was essentially slapped
in the face and told to bugger off. The Israelis have understandings with
the Russians, perhaps better than the Americans have managed and the Russians
have let Syria know that they are not going to take their side against
Israel. Jews have a good deal of influence in Russia’s oligarchies today
it seems, and it seems that Putin doesn’t want to pick fights with a country
filled with Russians who invest in and travel often to Russia. In fact,
this past month the Israelis instituted visa-free travel with Russia, something
that doesn’t exist between Russia and the USA.
My long term assessment stated several
years ago is still my main forecast. Which is that deals will be made first
with Syria and Iran that will affect Hamas and Hizbullah. Then and only
then will it be possible to deal with Palestinian affairs because otherwise
these groups have an effective veto with outsiders bent on stirring up
trouble and Fatah in any case is a joke with little street power or moral
authority within Palestine. However, once understandings are reached with
Syria and Iran, it will be possible to deal with Hamas if the Fatah functionaries
are incapable of delivering a solution. Hizbullah will go out of business
and will not be part of a deal. Right now Hamas is more able than Fatah
to deliver but it is simply not interested in dealing with the Israelis
at this time because it is more in the business of carrying out the designs
of its patrons than state building. But this will change at some point
once the patrons are satisfied.
That said, I must also say that although
the terms of an agreement with the Palestinians are essentially known to
all, the ultimate shape of what sovereignty will exist is now up for grabs.
The concept of a two-state solution is ebbing away into the realm of the
theoretical. Nobody really believes in it anymore, certainly not the future
prospective leaders of Israel and, despite all the talk, the facts on the
ground are becoming universally believed to be irreversible. The Palestinians
don’t believe they can unite to deliver a viable state and see the Israelis
as hell-bent on a divide and conquer strategy both physically on the ground
as well as on a person to person basis (ie: setting tribes and clans against
each other); the Israelis don’t see the Palestinians as capable of uniting
to deliver a stable entity that could assure them of security and consistency;
and the Arabs don’t think much of the Palestinians overall. Oded, the analyst
in Israel who has been consistently dour and curmudgeonly of all this for
the nearly 20 years that I have known him, has also been the most consistently
correct for these 20 years and he has all this time said that the Palestinians
will settle for autonomy within an Israeli state. I’ve heard more and more
Palestinians say over the past 2 years that this is what they see as the
long-term solution because nothing else shows any chance of happening,
and I have a feeling that this is where things are going and that Palestinians
may not necessarily be hostile toward this eventuality because Israel basically
works and the Arab states neighboring them don’t have much to offer economically
or politically.
I still expect action against Iran,
particularly if it becomes clear that Obama will win the election. Right
now, Bush has no reason to be supportive of what could be a failed exercise
or something that creates great heat while McCain is trying to look responsible
and electable and he may not want to saddle McCain with his decision on
the matter. But if Obama is likely to win, Bush will not shirk what he
believes is his God-given duty to put Iran in its place and he will not
stand in Israel’s way to uproot what it sees as this cancer which it believes
is an existential necessity. In such a venture, I expect no true opposition
from the Arabs, particularly Saudi Arabia.
I’m looking forward to my visit to
the region in December to see what is the effect of the oil surplus to
the developing Gulf, to sort the hype from the reality, to see where Iran
fits in and what is the prospect for the Arab-Israeli agenda after the
US elections. |