| That
11,000 extra people in France died during this past summer’s heatwave (so
sayeth the French health ministry) helps put some things into perspective.
America losing 40 soldiers a month in Iraq is not going to bring the house
down, and I haven’t seen a wave of resignations going on this month in
France which, despite supposedly having the world’s best health care system,
still seems to value its vacations more than its elderly. Best prize
for Frenchies who won’t let anything get in the way of their summer vacation
goes to the man who was indicted for dumping his elderly father on the
doorstep of his brother knowing he was on vacation.
Another really awful statistic I came across this
month is that 8% of Americans on any given day are eating at McDonalds.
Given that I estimate that 20% of Americans would never eat in a McDonalds,
that means there is a sizeable element among the American population that
must eat tons of McDonalds.
US Foreign Policy in the Middle East
The Bush Administration confounds analysts who
try to keep tabs on whether Powell or Rumsfeld is at the top. Right now
it looks like Powell is getting the president’s ear as the administration
trots out a shift toward bringing in the UN. And then, after it appears
that the UN or diplomacy doesn’t work, Rumsfeld comes back on top. This
is a tactical sideshow; the US has been on a learning curve with regard
to Iraq and, in my opinion, still doesn’t get it.
One person who does get it is the commander of
the 101st Aireborne division, who is pretty much running the show in the
Kurdish areas of Northern Iraq. That part of the country is running well
and this is because there is good cooperation on the ground between the
military commander and the locals who are being given a big say in what
gets done; the commander has pretty much been ignoring Washington and the
bigshots in Baghdad. It also helps that there is hardly any sabotage taking
place in that part of the country.
Paul Bremer is on a learning curve but still trying
to run things top down; the Americans are trying to set up Iraqi armed
entities under “the US army”, which I think is an intrinsic mistake. Iraqis
will not swallow anything labeled US army. They will swallow an Iraqi army,
and the US would be smarter to help the Iraqis set up an Iraqi army and
try to build Iraqi state institutions, because that is the only thing that
in the long run will ensure that the US gets out without this becoming
a Vietnamese-like swamp and without Iraq becoming more of a threat than
a model for the region.
The UN and the various countries are not going
to let the Americans suck them into doing their dirty work in Iraq, but
they cannot afford to sit around and suffer the consequences of American
failure; the global economy is interdependent. But the UN has some
reforming to do; till now it has been an organization that values sovereignty
over human rights. Iraq’s Hussein and Zimbabwe’s Mugabe got a free ride
from the UN. Countries such as Germany and Japan pay lots of bills and
get little say in that organization. The UN was set up in 1945 and still
reflects the world of 1945. It has to change in order to be relevant.
There was an interesting article this past weekend
in the NY Times Magazine about America’s policy of intervention. The article
noted that in the entire history of the US, almost every year one could
see that the US was intervening somewhere abroad. The issue is not whether
or not to intervene, the question is under what circumstances. It is a
tricky issue; if American policy is too cautious, it leads troublemakers
to assume that America is weak and that they can strike, which then leads
to greater American intervention. No doubt that the Americans wouldn’t
have gone into Afghanistan and Iraq were it not for 9/11 which was a byproduct
of retreats from places such as Somalia and Lebanon (remember when bombers
hit American marines in Beirut leading to a withdrawal). The problem is
not American intervention or non-intervention; the problem is a lack of
consistency in policy.
This lack of consistency also explains something
very relevant today. There is a debate as to whether or not the Arab World
wants democracy and whether the Americans should be trying to help establish
this. Many people think the Arabs don’t want it because they are so busy
hating America. I disagree; I think Arabs know what democracy is and that
they want it. Palestinians consistently say they respect the Israeli democratic
system and even award it higher ratings than the American system, presumably
because they are most familiar with the Israeli system. What the Arabs
don’t like is the American foreign policy that says that democracy is fine
for the Arabs as long as it leads to results that the Americans want. Otherwise,
it is OK for the Americans to overturn the results. That’s what the Arabs
hate; it is the feeling that American democracy only exists for Americans,
not for them. It is one area of inconsistency of American policy that has
the effect of screwing up all of the American efforts at executing a successful
foreign policy.
Israel/Palestine
I read a good joke today. Arafat and Abbas are
driving in a car and Arafat sees a tree in the road and yells to Abbas
to avoid the tree. His warnings get more hysterical until finally the car
hits the tree. The two, exhausted, are limping away from the car. “I told
you about the tree,” says Arafat. “But you were driving,” says Abbas.
These days people are in mourning over the death
of the road map and the resignation of Abbas. I never expected much from
it or him from the very beginning and said so. The road map was doomed
because it (despite its nickname) like the Oslo accord never gave either
side any definitive vision of an endgame and how to get there. It was all
process-oriented, and it assumed the fiction that Abbas would negotiate
and condemn terrorism, Hamas would terrorize, Arafat would pull the strings
and do everything possible to subvert Abbas, Sharon would move roadblocks
and caravans from one side of the road to the other, and everyone would
wink and nod. As I’ve said, two things have to happen in order for anything
else to happen. One of them is happening: Sharon is going after Hamas leadership
and, if he had used a 1 ton bomb instead of becoming more shy about it
since last year’s fiasco, he would have dealt them a decisive blow this
past weekend by knocking off Sheikh Yassin and a good number of their leadership
in a summit two floors below where the bomb hit. Sharon was evidently stung
by the resignation of Ephraim Halevy, his head of the national security
council and former Mossad chief, who came out and said that Sharon is not
really running the country nor does he have any idea of where to go. The
second is that, despite the popular wisdom, in my opinion the Israelis
have to permanently erase Arafat from the world. Beyond that, the Israelis
cannot change Palestinian society and save the Palestinians from themselves
any more than the Americans or the Jews can save the Israelis from themselves.
Clearly, moderate Palestinians need and want the Israelis to knock off
the Hamas and PA mafia which is preventing them from making any progress,
and that much the Israelis have to do for them. The rest is up to them.
If they, along with sectors of Iraqis want to go around killing each other
and dooming their civilizations to endless states of war, there is not
much anyone else can do to stop them. It is bad that the Americans are
not doing a good job of securing Iraq, but it is even worse that the Iraqis
have a good number of people more interested in sabotaging Iraq for their
own personal benefit than in rebuilding it. It is not just foreign troublemakers
in Iraq; it is also Iraqis of various interests that are intent on destabilizing
the country because they hope to profit from it.
Over the long term, Iraq will work out. Slowly
but surely it will work, in spite of the Americans. As for Israel-Palestine,
it’s going to be a rather hot winter with a very tough offensive by the
Israelis to finish off Hamas if possible; in their minds and based on the
past ceasefire, the best they can get from Hamas is a ceasefire which will
be used to retool for the next round of hostilities. The Americans are
really not in a position to object, given their own problems keeping the
peace over their own occupation of Iraq. Maybe the Israeli hotels will
lower their prices by the time Passover comes; after 2 months of quiet
this summer, the hotel managers became overconfident and raised their prices
50% for the upcoming season. Frankly, the prices are ridiculous (a suite
at a nice hotel in Jerusalem is roughly the price of a honeymoon suite
on the Amalfi coast, and the two are not equivalent properties) and I wouldn’t
mind if they became a bit less arrogant.
Sharon is a bit of a wildcard; he has a scandal
around him that can bring him down, but the country knows he is the only
game in town. As long as there is a chance of peace, they will hold their
noses and keep him in the leader’s chair. Which means that Sharon wants
there to be a sense that without him there cannot be peace, but at the
same time he doesn’t want to make real decisions that alienate his power
base. This is not new; it is the same old game and it is pretty much the
same with Arafat. The charade is lost on nobody, but everyone is still
stuck in the circle without a chair.
A recent meeting in Canada turned up an interesting
fact: Hamas is more a Sunni than a Shiite organization. If so, this means
that at a certain point Hamas only has a certain amount in common with
the Iranians; it also explains why so much of their funding comes from
Saudi Arabia.
Economy
The American economy is turning around and there
is a slow recovery. I see indications of increased business. However, jobs
are not being created yet, and the housing market is set for a fall. A
top mortgage broker went bankrupt after being caught in the squeeze of
interest rates going up very quickly last month. A major home construction
company this week announced a 13% reduction in personnel. Many home mortgages
did not close because of the rise in interest rates. There are major pressures
on the US dollars to drop against the euro, despite the recent gains. The
dollar is being subsidized to some extent by the Chinese and the recent
calls for the Chinese to devalue the yuan is BS because it would actually
make things very difficult for the US in the short term if the Chinese
did so. People who bought into indexes a few months ago on my advice did
very well for themselves. Personally, I am in a marriage year and have
not bought anything and I am uncomfortable watching my friends become rather
exuberant again about the state of tech stocks. I think the market cannot
sustain these prices and caution against individual companies and figure
that the markets themselves will probably fall into the 4th quarter as
tensions concerning the US dollar, the national budget deficit and the
housing markets (and consumer spending which will be affected as home values
are squeezed despite recent gains in indexes of consumer confidence) make
their inevitable dent in capital markets. Recall that last time interest
rates went up as they did, it took 18 months for real estate markets to
react. So I fully expect that sooner or later this real estate bubble (which
I have been warning about for the past year or so – see my article dated
22 March 2001) to burst even if it has been taking longer than I originally
thought. Remember though that the stock market didn’t crash in a day in
2000 and that after it spent a year going down 50%, it spent another year
going down another 50%, so patience is a virtue here and 1% on your CD
is not necessarily a losing proposition nor is not buying a house if you
believe it costs too much.
Bush’s Re-Election Prospects
What about Bush’s re-election? Pretty simple here.
The Democrats have nobody worth the fight. The terrorists will strike again
in the next year on US soil hoping ostensibly to make Bush look like a
failure. As per Israel’s Sharon, it will drive the population into the
arms of Bush. Besides, I’m not sure that Osama bin Laden is unhappy with
the direction in which the world is going. The US is pulling out of Saudi
Arabia, the Arab world still hates America, and every jihadi and his goat
is heading toward Iraq and Afghanistan to pick up a sword and fight America.
I heard this past April he hosted a terrorism summit with 5,000 people
in attendance. I’d like to know if the CIA was also there and, if not,
why didn’t we bomb the 5,000 people there or did we not get an invitation?
Montreal Travel Advice
Here is some travel advice regarding Montreal,
a fairly good shopping and fun town roughly an hour’s flight from New York.
50 Minutes on Delta from Laguardia to Montreal Dorval airport; 20 minute
drive to town normally, but allow 35 minutes during rush hour. 10 minute
walk from gate to passport control (escalators were broken but there is
an elevator) but expected to get better when new terminal is finished next
year. Taxi is $20 fixed to/from airport. Le St. James hotel is located
between Old Montreal and the Downtown areas and is an excellent 60 room
boutique hotel; only 5 star hotel in Old Montreal in a converted bank building
opened a year ago; very good food and beverage (and a lovely dining room)
and personalized service with a good health spa. We knew names of staff
people by name by the end of the weekend. Junior suite was about $325 a
night; manager is William Dagher (514.841.3111). Rooms are a bit dark and
have no views but it is a good hotel. The Intercontinental is a block away;
the Loews Hotel Vogue is a block from Holts Renfrew department store and
is about $200 per night.
A nighttime walk around Old Montreal found it pretty
deserted although it had been raining that evening. But a night walk on
Crescent Street closer to center city found it much more happening. Saturday
walk around downtown; world film festival in progress. Window shopping;
Ogilvy’s a nice store; also Holt’s Renfrew. Looked at winter coats; Mayor
Street has many such stores; also Alexanders on Peele Street. Several department
stores have closed over the years (Eton and Simpsons). Prices of things
such as fine china and dishware (ie: Haviland and Vileroy and Boch) are
quite more expensive here than in NY, at least in the big department stores;
food and services and presumably furs are cheaper. Early evening walk along
the Old Port and the Old City to City Hall and nearby parks. Hotel is 3
blocks from the Notre Dame Cathedral. There is a Movenpick Marche at Rue
University & Rue Cathcart and it remains my favorite evening out concept;
would probably be fantastic as a franchise in a Gulf country.
Sunday brunch at Ritz Carlton garden with ducks,
accordionist and lovely buffet. Too bad we couldn’t eat the baby lamb chops
looking so succulent and rare. They said they had no seats, but you can
get seated anyway and there were plenty of empty seats. A bit of walking
along St. Catherine and Sherbrooke Streets, taxi ride up Mount Royale for
city views and then return to New York City via the airport where you preclear
customs before boarding the flight. You can get the tax refund form (ie:
for tax on hotels) via the internet if you forget to pick it up.
On my way out today for another quick 12 day tour
of spots in Europe and Asia; will be flying Alitalia and Cathay; definitely
not a good day today to be flying American carriers, eh? |