| I've
misspelled his name on purpose because he doesn't want his name in print,
but for the benefit of our private network, here are my notes from a workshop
with a leading analyst on the Middle East / Israel-Arab issues.
Gaza and Palestinians.....Big mistake
people make is to confuse peace monitors with peace enforcers. Monitors
only observe and work if the parties themselves are interested in keeping
the peace. Enforcers hardly ever exist and nobody is willing to do it between
Israelis and Arabs.....Arab moderates tell Israel that if they talk to
Hamas, they undermine them for negotiating rather than fighting and will
be viewed by people around them as quislings....The key to the next Israeli
election is the extent Mubarak is willing to safeguard Egypt’s border with
Gaza or otherwise force Israel to deal with it. If he won’t deal with it,
the war will be protracted and Bibi will win the elections. Mubarak hates
Bush and would be more inclined to give Obama the concession. Believes
that Israel held back a week and continues to hold off going after the
border areas hoping Egypt will save them from the task but that without
controlling the tunnels on the Rafah border, the whole operation will ultimately
be a waste of time...Fayyad, the PA prime minister, should be popular because
he has done more than anyone else to raise Palestinian living standards
and try to build a nation-state. He might not be popular to be elected
without Abbas, who is expected to remain for at least another year in his
office....Issue of land between Israel and PA on the West Bank is virtually
nil, meaning the parties both agree as to what the borders should be after
land is exchanged. The key now is that the Israelis should agree in writing
to borders and stop building on the land; the army can stay put for awhile
as the PA builds up its own army to later secure the peace....Shaul Mofaz,
former army chief of staff, says that the difference between Gaza and West
Bank is that on the West Bank, the Israelis could encircle a town and wait
for the militants to surrender. In Gaza, they’d have to go into urban areas
and get them out because there are too many places to go within the sprawl
that is Gaza....
Syria....Less of an independent actor
these days as it is more and more reliant on Iran for oil. The Syrians
don’t like the Iranians and feel they have not been keeping their promises
to them. Their economy is falling apart and they need to fix it... Israel
military is biggest faction in Israel arguing for peace with the Syrians.
The Israelis want to work with Assad and not have the country fall to fundamentalists.
In many of these countries, the Islamists are more organized than the Democrats
because the regimes do not shut down mosques and do not take on the Islamic
ideology that is also political in nature...The nuclear installation wasn’t
even known to the defense minister; made the Israelis more trustful of
dealing with Bashar Assad since he could keep a secret and was obviously
in enough control to be running this project....Syrians want to return
to the Arab fold; were really hurt when they finally got to host the Arab
summit last year and nobody showed up...Agrees with Stratfor’s analysis
that Syria is acting against Hizbullah in Lebanon and that is one thing
driving the talks in Turkey (ie: how to work with Israel on this)...The
Lebanese are more apt to concede these days that a deal between Syria and
Israel does not necessarily screw Lebanon. They realize that Lebanon is
becoming more Iran and less Syria and this is a bad thing. Bringing Syria
back into the game under the rubric of overall peace would be a good thing....Nobody
expects to disarm Hizbullah; just control the inflow of what they are building
there, which right now is a nuisance but not more than that....Cute story:
Hafez Assad’s nephew said his father was only in charge of the first day
of the Hama operation, but not the second day. Meaning I guess that he
was only responsible for killing 10k of the 15,000 people?
Iran....Will reach critical mass
of nuclear development by September and then could basically kick out the
inspectors or use such threat to neutralize the world. The NPT (nuclear
proliferation treaty) would then be ignored by the world as everyone would
proceed to go nuclear. ...Regime change in Iran would be long-term. There
is a long road between dying and dead and this is where the Iranian regime
is nowadays. So don’t bank on it and try to solve this problem now without
waiting for elections and whatever comes afterward....Bahrain’s new ambassador
to the USA is a Jewish woman; they obviously think American Jews run the
show here...Pentagon nixed Israeli attempt to bomb Iran. They thought the
Israeli army were not that professional in Lebanon in 2006 and are afraid
they won’t really succeed and that the consequences will just make more
trouble for the US and its soldiers in the region. Perhaps the current
operation will regain some of that currency....Focus is now on Obama attempt
to talk to the Iranians and hopefully get the Europeans, Russians and Chinese
to give him leverage to get the Iranians to agree. The EEC negotiator for
Iran “gets it.” Russian might trade the nuclear base in Czech for applying
screws to Iran, especially since the US says the Czech base is to protect
against Iranian missiles. The Israelis are not likely to want to screw
up Obama’s chance to talk to the Iranians but will want to know that the
talks have a deadline and that their failure will result in a real penalty
before September 2009...Holbrooke is a good appointment to deal with Pakistan.
Elections...Likud had picked up 15
of its 20 seats from the center-left bloc of voters. Bibi would rather
run a unity government with Barak and Labor than a simple right-wing government.
To see how the elections go, forget about how the war is being fought,
just see how it ends and if it ends well. |