| Anyone
in leadership who seriously thinks about the future of American Jewry grapples
with 3 interlocking challenges: how to keep the highest number of them
affiliated, informed and active. The clear trend is toward unaffiliation,
apathy and evidence of disconnect from communal structures. Traditional
means of involving people in the world beyond their households have changed
in a universal sense and the hot-button issues that motivated people to
think beyond themselves no longer exist. As examples, newspaper readership
and top-three television network viewership are down significantly. Anti-semitism
and fear of Arab warfare against Israel no longer excite. The Holocaust
has become commoditized and charitable giving has shifted toward universal
donor-directed causes. The Internet is a vibrant place to be Jewish today,
but it is a highly fragmented market, personal to the user and the sense
of community is fleeting. Mounting evidence of alienation and depression
among those substituting Internet interaction to traditional media is convincing
and disturbing.
While we have reached that point in history where
creating a Jewish newspaper to reach the masses is longer viable, technology
and sociology have converged to make it feasible to create a Jewish TV
network that would provide a freely accessible means of interacting Jewishly
both on personal, communal and universal levels. Such an instrument can
reach the masses at no cost to the user. It can inform, educate, persuade
and call to action. Though some will argue that even television has become
passe in an Internet age, it is maintained that television is still the
best medium to deliver a broad-based message and unify a community of interests.
It can also help to create culture and familiarize people to each other
across national and ethnic lines. Both of these are necessary to create
positive role models and compelling reasons for maintaining Jewish identity
into the next generation. A strong theme that guides this study is the
desire to use television to bring people closer to each other and to be
exposed to different types of people in a positive manner they might otherwise
not get to know on their own (ie: Americans & Israelis; Moroccans and
Russians)..
What is proposed is a 24 hour a day, 6 day a week
television network that will produce and acquire programs that will service
the needs of all sectors of the Jewish community, from the unaffiliated
to the ultra-orthodox. It will speak to the Jewish world but to no particular
locale and will itself be apolitical with an independent voice while hosting
programs that provide lively debate and reporting of issues without excessive
regard to the interests of any particular person, faction or association.
Initially, it will broadcast to an audience in the New York City metropolitan
area, home to as many Jews as the State of Israel. In its second stage,
the network feed will be available via satellite to whichever cable or
DSS system wishes to receive it. Such a network may attract additional
customers to cable or DSS systems.
The central assumption of this report is that the
cost of production and acquisition of programs can be brought down to an
affordable amount, given advances in and the reduced cost of technology
and the fact that most of the programming can be taped and prepared at
low cost using mainly young professionals in entry-level positions using
their efforts at the network as an experience-gaining position. A strong
lineup of quality programs should draw devoted segments of viewers on the
strength of their content as opposed to their razzle dazzle component with
a strong emphasis on in-studio faces and low-budget location prepared pieces.
The cost of transmission is too high a variable to be able to be studied
here, and such costs may be both uneconomical and physically impossible
(ie: if no one is wiling to host such a network on their cable or satellite
system). In any event, this study does not propose that such a network
can be run at a profit but that it could be run at a low enough level of
subsidy to be tolerable, and that the Jewish community would get the benefit
of a bargain in subsidizing this form of public television system. Perhaps
profit will eventually become a factor, and the tendency of such a network
to draw among the most desirable of demographics of any network in existence
as well as the desire of opinion-makers of all stripes both in the US and
abroad to gain access to such a viewership in real time (which this network
would make possible for the first time) should work in its favor.
Programming Content
The following discussion focuses on Monday - Thursday
programming. Friday features an abridged schedule with afternoon shutdowns,
the exact hour depending on the season. Saturday night has a special schedule.
Sunday contains repeats of weekday programs along with an emphasis on acquired
programs and some public affairs programs. Space on Sundays would also
be set aside for programs produced and perhaps paid for by various interests
within the Jewish community that want access to the network (ie: causes,
organizations, factions).
The weekday 6:00 - 9:30 bloc would consist of educational
and religious programming, including early morning readings and explanations
of psalms and works from the mussar movement. An early morning Talmud learning
session would be coordinated with the worldwide Daf Yomi rotation. Other
programs would cover biblical concepts and stories, folklore and history.
A short program “Words of Faith” would follow the BBC model and allow for
a rotating pulpit. “Ask the Rabbi (or Rebetzin)” would be an interactive
Q&A opportunity.
At 9:30, Uncle Avi and the Mitzvah Gang changes
the orientation toward the toddler audience with fun, manners and basic
Jewish concepts. Next comes Shvitz, an aerobics and physical exercise program
with emphasis on Yiddish and Hebrew speaking by appropriate instructor-hosts.
At 10:30 begins the first of 3 programs during the day labeled “Lecture
Hall” which are 40 and 55 minute slots dedicated either to the presentation
of lectures of serious topics, readings, or coverage of events, drawing
from the C-SPAN model. Examples could range from a lecture on Jewish Life
in New Orleans during the Civil War, coverage of a session at a recent
AIPAC conference, to a reading from a piece of literature, fiction or nonfiction.
A 15 minute relay of English-language news from Israel Television would
lead to the 2nd Lecture Hall Session followed by a 45 minute Ulpan which
would demonstrate a daily commitment to Hebrew language instruction. Following
Ulpan would be relay of the evening Hebrew-language newscast from Israel
Television with simultaneous English translation. The final hour
of this rather segmented and eclectic mix would be foreign language programming
directed at either the Russian or Yiddish community on an alternating day
basis.
The network reverts to a more mainstream feed at
3pm with Conference Call featuring a moderated discussion among a group
of ten people seated round a table in a sort of town meeting without the
ruckus of a studio audience. A second version of this might feature a guest
moderator who is the focus of questions from those around the table. If
this program is broadcast live, there would be opportunity for viewers
to interact via e-mail or telephone. Children’s programming follows
beginning with a dubbed Israeli version of Sesame Street known as Rehov
Sumsum (or some other appropriate program) and a repeat of Uncle Avi for
those who didn’t see it earlier or those with West Coast feeds. Next is
Fricassee, a program for pre-teens and teens, with two sets of hosts each
geared toward the 8-13 and 13-17 age group, on alternating days. This is
a high priority program and is explained separately.
The dinner hour includes a cooking program and
a crafts program which lead into the 7pm Flagship program with news and
features. This is the network’s other high priority program and is explained
separately. Following the Flagship program at 8pm is a family hour dedicated
to special or acquired programming. The 9pm hour is a nightly rotation
of special interest originally produced programming: Singles Scene, Business,
People, Ideas. Within this rotation is a mixture of discussion and reporting.
The third installment of Lecture Hall begins at 10, followed by a repeat
of the morning Daf Yomi lecture and the Folklore and Words of Faith programs.
At midnight is a repeat of the Flagship Program. From 1am to 6am is an
original program “Night-Shift” where video hosts play records, take phone
calls, dispense advice and keep insomniacs company. Hosts would include
a rotation of teenagers, students, and members of various communities such
as Israeli, Russian, Latin, etc.
The sabbath and holidays present special religious
programming opportunities and these would appear in the hours preceding
and following these occasions.
Look and Feel
Continuity and an overall look and feel would be
provided by trailers promoting various programs, public service announcements,
commercial advertisements and/or program sponsor announcements, voiceovers
by a permanent announcer narrating program trailers and public service
announcements, leading viewers from one program into another and the displaying
of headlines and vital information at the top of selected hours during
the broadcast day. The intended look and feel of the network is BBC-1 with
a mellow flow and limited commercial interruption, that will serve as a
type of comforting accessory to keep one company through the day and night.
No one’s blood pressure should go up watching the network and content should
be suitable for all ages and sensitivities all the time. Vocabulary and
content must be welcoming to one who has no Jewish background or who is
not Jewish. The main challenge is to provide Jewish content to a Jewish
audience without the appearance of kitchiness and preachiness that will
have the effect of making most Jews change to another channel. By emulating
a state-run entity such as the BBC or PBS instead of having the look and
feel of an ethnic or religious channel, it should be possible to navigate
this field correctly.
Back to Content: Details Concerning Certain
Types of Programs
Following are more detailed descriptions of the
leading programs that will require focused resources because they broadcast
to the segments of the viewing audience that demand this level of attention:
the teen hour and the nightly flagship broadcast.
The teen program is hosted by youths covering teen
concerns who tend to go outside the studio and explore. They might visit
college campuses and programs in the US and abroad, explore opportunities
such as March of the Living, various organizations that exist for young
people or that may wish to introduce themselves to young people, and interact
with other Jews and experience their situations (ie: Israel-pre-army, scouts,
pre-college testing, kibbutz, exchange programs) and engage in interactions
that showcase skills such as athletics, fashions, dance trends, computer
technology. Also discussion of subjects facing teenagers such as religious
and sociological issues and choices. These interactions do not necessarily
have to involve only Jews and the benefit of such interchanges can add
to the more general efforts at stimulating dialogue and mutual understanding
among peoples.
The Flagship program is slated for an hour of prime
viewing time with a repeat geared for late watchers in the east and prime
time viewers in pacifica. The program opens with a 10 minute newscast with
some field reports followed by a weekly rotation of departments that are
built around two 12 minute blocks per show, each containing a central feature
story. The rest of the program would be filled with short spots highlighting
community calendar events, and a soapbox opportunity by various personalities
to expound for 3-4 minutes on a subject. Examples of Feature Blocs include
The Cutting Edge: Developments in Business, Science and Technology that
are being produced in the Jewish World; One People: Visits to Jewish
communities somewhere else and a hearing of their views. Other slots include
in-depth stories about issues of current interest; exposure to interesting
people and their skills; coverage of the next generation and issues concerning
them; features that answer questions put to the network by viewers; political
roundtable debate; and explanation of Jewish concepts in a more business-like
manner than would be found in the religious instructional programming cycle.
On Fridays, a feature block would include coverage of some sort of religious
issue, along with a short sermon appropriate to the sabbath and a musical
presentation. The Flagship program on Sunday evenings would be limited
to the 10 minute newscast.
Here is a sample list of features that might make
up a week’s worth of such a program: Yugoslavia's Jews and their Unique
Position as Intermediaries Amid Civil War; Teenage Prep Schools for
Aspiring Israeli Army Commandos; Town Meeting: The Role of An American
Jewish Lobby; Focus Group of Germans Watching Schindler's List; The
Explosion of New Jewish-Interest Cinema in Europe and the East Bloc;
Living Wills Amid Jewish and Civil Law; The Cutting Edge: Japanese
and Korean R&D Investment in Israeli Hi-Tech Companies.
On Saturday evenings, Melave Malka would be a family-oriented
celebration of the sabbath and offer entertainment suitable to a religious
audience as well as a general audience that appreciates music, literature
and discussion. This program would be presented in a short form immediately
with the start of programming after the sabbath and then in its intended
form on Saturday nights. Programs can involve various families from various
places, on the same or different programs.
Before leaving the topic of content, a word about
acquired and special programs, just to give an idea of the breadth of possibilities
for this channel. Each year the Limmud conference in Britain offers over
1,000 lectures during a 5 day period on almost every conceivable topic.
Video tapes of these lectures could fill Lecture Hall slots for the entire
year alone. Then of course there are CAJE conferences and all sorts
of authorities here and abroad who would enjoy the opportunity of taping
lectures to be broadcast to Jewish audiences. Examples of programs that
can be imported are dubbed teen programs from Israel, Jewish Film Festival
selections, documentaries from production companies, the cultural, sports
and religious programming libraries of Israeli Television (ie: Israeli
Philharmonic and cantorial concerts, football and basketball), coverage
of Yeshiva sports leagues and their regional and national tournaments,
and original programs that fill gaps (ie: visit to russia to document current
situation and attitudes and activities taking place in the country such
as YUSSR and JDC). Then of course there are films, concerts, book readings,
plays and Jewish festivals that aggregate talent, invite coverage and that
are constantly occurring throughout the world.
Sabbath and Holiday Shutdowns
The network would cease broadcasting on Fridays
between 4pm and 7pm, depending on the season and always at 4pm on a holiday
eve. Studios would cease production at 4pm on Fridays and would open only
on Saturday and Sunday nights for Night Shift (live) and the 7pm newscast
on Sunday. On special occasions, the Sunday morning political affairs programs
might be retaped or broadcast live if the Friday versions are out of date
by air time. Saturday nights and post-holidays, programming would begin
between 7pm and 10pm depending on the season. During shutdown, one
option might be continuous video with music in the background or live relay
of Israel Radio in the background. Another option might be to lease the
channel to some other broadcaster in order to create income to subsidize
the rest of the week. It is estimated that the network would lose an additional
10-13 days per year of broadcasts due to holidays.
Revenue
Possible sources of revenue include an Internet
site geared toward commerce which receives percentage of revenues from
referrals to third party vendors, royalties from merchandising products
over the air or elsewhere, royalties from the licensing of characters created
by programs associated with the network (ie: characters arising out of
children’s programming produced by the network); sponsorships of program
series (ie: daf yomi) or special programs or parts of programs that focus
on particular items of interest (ie: sefardi history). It is also possible
that viewers will become members as they do with other forms of public
television and that such contributions can be induced via incentive marketing
programs. Commercial advertisers might include retailers and service enterprises,
causes and politicians seeking Jewish support or recognition, industrial
and commercial entities seeking goodwill, and companies seeking investment.
Finally, it is possible that such a network would be made available to
viewers on a subscription basis over certain cable and/or satellite systems.
All told, it is estimated that perhaps $1.5 million per year could be raised
through these means, and that another $1-2 million would be needed from
direct philanthropy or allocation from communal organizations to cover
administrative and programming expenses on a yearly basis.
Expenses
Attached are sample budgets with allocation models,
as well as sample broadcast schedules and allocation models as to the production
of the relevant programs. Also attached are some projections with regard
to revenues. As said above, the main cost which is airtime, cannot be determined
with any amount of certitude. The value of a dedicated channel to Time
Warner in Manhattan could well be $50 million a year and there is fierce
competition for space by deep-pocketed corporate customers; on the other
hand, it might be offered for much less or in return for subscription or
advertising revenue if Time Warner saw either a benefit to having such
a channel exist or were pressured into releasing space on its system for
such a channel. There are other ethnic communities that might want such
a network as well but the Jewish community need not fear being the first
or the most persuasive. The cost of providing satellite feed for the purpose
of making this network’s programming available beyond New York City is
not known but is estimated to be high enough that it is not under consideration
for the initial stage of this project. Certainly the cost of providing
a network feed via Internet would be low enough to be affordable.
It might well be that air time could be procured at low or no cost from
a cable system in a secondary city such as Miami but it needs to be measured
against the cost and effort of producing programming for a limited audience.
Ultimately, if this study is correct, the cost of such a project can be
made tolerable and suitable product can be delivered to at least the New
York metropolitan Jewish community; the question is whether or not the
benefit is worth the cost.
This survey contends that the amount of funds directed
to this project would be an efficient and relatively inexpensive investment
of resources toward promoting communal objectives toward a mass audience,
inculcating communal values and a positive Jewish identity upon the next
generation, educating sectors of the community according to their various
needs who will not leave their homes to receive such instruction, and making
various sectors of the community feel that their interests are being served
and heard. This project will make the masses of Jews feel closer, part
of something bigger, and more conscious of issues and concerns on a daily
basis. As yet, no project has attempted or achieved such results, but the
time might now be ripe -- and the need compelling enough -- to try.
Click here to go to Budgets,
Sample Schedules, and more gory details. |